B for the win

I just read three articles titled: A for Alfi, B for Beatrice, C for Cecilia. In my opinion B for Beatrice was the best written out of these 3 articles. A for Alfi became a quite dreary read, the author definitely could have used a better vocabulary and more flowing sentences for a better read and a more fun read. Moreover, C for Cecilia was a second place winner because the first hook in the introduction really caught my attention; nonetheless, as I read on my attention also diverted (this may just be me and not the article.) I had a hard time really wanting to read this article because other than the first sentence nothing seemed interesting enough for me to engage in a focused reading. The vocabulary was sub par and the fluancy was not bad. B for Beatrice caught my attention with the first few sentences and I managed to read and stay focused throughout the whole article. Despite a few words I do not see fit for some of the sentences and not so perfect sentence structure and sensibility, the article was a good read and interesting. Due to the fact that the article was interesting and really had me focused, this article is the best out of the three.