DEF

I just finished reading the articles D for Danforth, E for Eunice, F for Foxglove. D for Danforth was a true D effort. because the body paragraphs did not relate back to the thesis, the structure of the essay was out of order. The whold essay seemed like a conglomerate of mixed ideas. Danforth did not have a well written essay. Obviously this essay is not a complete failure because he did truly have some good ideas and vocabulary; however, the presentation was not suit to my liking. From the first sentence to the ending, nothing was working out well for the author. E for Eunice would take the first place and is vastly better put together and more well written than D for Danforth and just a tad bit better than F for Foxglove. Eunice truly put together a very written essay from the great introduction, which drew me to the very good body paragraphs that showed a sense of sophistication and complexity. The body paragraphs did not fully go back to the thesis but none of the 3 paragraphs did. E for Eunice had a gerat beginning, great middle, and great ending. The second place winner is F for Foxglove. Foxglove was slightly less descriptive and lacking the sophisticated structure of E for Eunice. The introduction of Foxglove was truly amazing. I was so drawn into the great set up and how Foxglove really related back to the thesis better than the other too. However, he still does not have the same sophisticated and complex structure of E for Eunice.